Most Active Stories
- Citing Cost, City of Atlanta Says MARTA Won’t Operate Streetcar
- Nelson Mandela Dies at 95: A Look Back at His 1990 Atlanta Visit
- Atlanta Eyes Federal Funds For Streetcar Expansion
- Some Georgia Inmates Serving Life Sentences Without Parole To Be Re-Sentenced
- Head of Emory's Winship Cancer Institute: Sequestration Taking Toll
Local Program Hosts
Fri July 26, 2013
AP: Gov. Deal Says It Would Be 'Good Solution' If Georgia Power Absorbed Some Vogtle Costs
From Ray Henry (@rhenryAP) with the Associated Press:
Gov. Nathan Deal said this week that it would be a “good solution” if Southern Co. absorbed more of the extra costs incurred while building new reactors at Plant Vogtle.
The Republican told WSAV-TV that the state’s Public Service Commission must ultimately decide whether Southern Co. subsidiary Georgia Power can increase its construction budget by $737 million. The utility has announced it cannot meet its original $6.1 billion budget to build two reactors.
Customers will pay the cost of building the new plant, unless utility regulators block the company from passing along construction costs they find objectionable.
“There are certainly points to be made on the side of those who say the company should absorb more of the cost and not pass it on to ratepayers. Certainly if that could be done, that would be a good solution,” Deal told the TV station. “But I think we can’t lose sight of the fact that those two nuclear reactors will be the first new nuclear reactors in the United States in several decades, and it’s in my opinion a necessary impact of keeping the state of Georgia with adequate power resources.”
Georgia Power officials would not directly comment on Deal’s remark.
The utility said in a statement that building the reactors is the best economic choice for customers. The company said it’s using state-of-the-art technology and has an agreement with contractors meant to minimize financial risk to the utility and customers.
Earlier this month, Deal blamed rising construction costs on litigation filed by environmental groups, despite evidence to the contrary from Southern Co. and the independent monitor working for the state.
Southern Co. has attributed most of the cost increases to licensing, production and construction problems, but not legal challenges.