Atlanta Land Deal Angers People Who Want Affordable Housing

The Atlanta Housing Authority would give up control of one-third of its vacant land, or about 100 acres, according to agency estimates, and there is no requirement that affordable housing be built on it.

The 2011 deal between the housing authority and Integral Group came under scrutiny in March after the Journal-Constitution raised questions about its terms. The deal gave Integral several years to exercise options to purchase the properties, and pricing was to be determined by a complicated formula weighted toward values that were years out of date.

Integral Chairman and CEO Egbert Perry told the Journal-Constitution previously that he intended to sell homes he builds on the land at market prices.

CEO Catherine Buell, who inherited the option deal with Integral, said moving forward with it would be bad housing policy for the city.

“Affordable housing is disappearing at alarming rates, and allowing a private developer to purchase our land to build condos for the wealthy exacerbates the housing crisis and pushes low-income residents even further to the margins of our city,” Buell said in a statement.

Integral spokeswoman Shauna Grovell said in a statement that she could not say whether the housing authority’s estimate is valid.

“Without a formal appraisal, frankly, no one can be certain of those values,” Grovell said.

Perry previously argued that he deserves the discount because the properties were worth nothing until he and AHA redeveloped nearby parcels with mixed-income apartments. He informed AHA of Integral’s intention to exercise its options late last year.

Under Buell’s leadership, AHA filed suit in August asking a judge to kill the series of complicated contracts, which were signed as then-agency head Renee Glover faced pressure to leave her post. AHA would retain partial ownership of the properties, but Integral would have control over their development.

“The Atlanta Housing Authority is not a land bank for private developers to purchase land at rock-bottom prices,” Buell told the Journal-Constitution.

An expert hired by AHA gave a September estimate for the land’s value at $138 million, according to more than two dozen pages of records obtained by the AJC that detail the calculations and methodology.

Integral Properties would purchase the parcels for about $17.5 million, the records state.

Whether or not AHA’s price estimate is accurate, the city’s affordability crisis makes it a bad time to lose control of acres of public land that could be used for homes, said housing expert Dan Immergluck, a Georgia State University professor.

“On its face, it’s concerning,” Immergluck said of the estimates. “Where there is room for housing, we should be building affordable housing, that’s for sure.”

The deal has sparked outrage among local affordable housing advocates with the Housing Justice League. The league’s members protested outside a speaking engagement by Perry on affordable housing at the Center for Civil and Human Rights in September. They also launched a petition drive that garnered 1,200 signatures and demanded that the developer immediately stop the deal.

“I am horrified,” said organizer Tim Franzen. “We’re not in a crisis of resources. We’re in a crisis of moral authority. This deal shows us this.”

The deal now under dispute arranged for AHA to hold the property at the former Carver, Capitol, Grady and Harris homes tax-free as Integral decided whether to purchase it. The terms specified that sales prices would be based in part on much lower property values that date to when Integral and the AHA first built mixed-income housing on these sites in the late 1990s and 2000s.

AHA demolished nearly all of its public housing projects during those years as part of its nationally recognized, two-decade effort to replace low-income housing through the federal HOPE VI program. It encouraged public housing authorities to form partnerships with private developers to build mixed-income housing.

AHA board members who served at the time of the deal told the Journal-Constitution that they did not approve the options, and there is no evidence in U.S. Housing and Urban Development documents obtained by the newspaper through a Freedom of Information Act request of a 2011 approval.

The September pricing estimates, made by a real estate expert hired by the authority, are not formal appraisals. Instead, the analysis uses historical sales records, holding costs and other data to make complicated calculations of sales prices for more than 100 authority parcels scattered across the city.

These plots include some of AHA’s most coveted properties. Some are located blocks from the Old Fourth Ward’s popular bars and restaurants. Others are near the former Turner Field, which is slated for redevelopment, or along the southern leg of the massive BeltLine project, where prices are expected to skyrocket.

Land values have climbed since the early 2000s at all of the sites involved in the options deal. At the former Grady and Capitol sites they have nearly doubled, the newspaper’s investigation found.

Perry said previously that he might be open to building affordable housing, but argued that there is already too much of it at these sites.