Trump ordered to pay $9,000 for violating gag order in criminal hush money trial

Former President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media at Manhattan criminal court in New York, Thursday, April 25, 2024. (Jeenah Moon/Pool Photo via AP)

Former President Donald Trump has been held in contempt of the court and fined $9,000 for violating a gag order aimed at protecting witnesses and jurors in his Manhattan criminal trial.

Prosecutors in Trump’s criminal trial last month asked Merchan to fine him $10,000 for violating a gag order and rule Trump in contempt of court. Last week, prosecutors asked Merchan to hold Trump in contempt for 10 posts made on Trump’s Truth Social profile and his official campaign profile about potential witnesses in the case, including former lawyer Michael Cohen and adult film star Stormy Daniels; among those 10 posts was one that echoed Fox News host Jesse Waters’ opinion that “undercover liberal activist” were “lying to the judge in order to get on the Trump jury.”

On Thursday, Merchan will also hold a hearing regarding four additional posts brought up by the prosecution last week.



Weeks before the trial began, Merchan issued a gag order on Trump that specifically bars him from making or directing others to make public statements about potential jurors, court staff or family members of staff.

Last week, Trump went after Cohen again in the courthouse hallway as he left for the day.

“When are they going to look at all the lies that Cohen did in the last trial?” Trump said. Prosecutors last week argued this statement amounted to another violation and they plan to file another order today.

Trump, the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee, is accused of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records with the intent to further other crimes ahead of the 2016 presidential election. Trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges. The jury has already heard from several witnesses including former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker, First Republic Bank banker Gary Farro and long time Trump executive assistant Rhona Graff.

Trump’s lawyer Todd Blanche argued that when Trump took to Truth Social to talk about the case, he was simply defending himself against attacks from Daniels and Cohen. But when pressed by Merchan to provide specific examples of those attacks, Blanche did not provide any. Blanche also tried to argue that prosecutors did not challenge every single related repost on Trump’s social media profile, which Merchan seemed to dismiss outright.

“You’re losing all the credibility with the court,” Merchan warned Trump’s lawyers as they debated whether or not Trump was trying to comply with the order.

Trump has challenged the gag order, including a failed attempt to delay the trial while he fought it. An appeals court judge’s decision to keep the gag order in place came less than a week before jury selection began.

Trump has argued that this order is unconstitutionally limiting his political speech as he campaigns to be the next president. In the ruling that put the gag in order in place, Merchan rejected Trump’s assertion that his statements “constitute core political speech.”

The current gag order does not cover Merchan or Bragg. Both have also been a recipient of the former president’s ire.

In a series of posts on Truth Social, his social media platform, Trump, without evidence called the gag order “ELECTION INTERFERENCE.”

The former president has faced penalties for violating gag orders in his prior New York trials. In the fall he was fined a collective $15,000 for two violations in his civil fraud trial — one instance which resulted in Trump unexpectedly being called up to the witness stand. Both fines were for statements seemingly made about the judge’s clerk.

The judge in that case, Arthur Engoron, noted that his chambers had been “inundated with hundreds of harassing and threatening phone calls, voicemails, emails, letters and packages” since beginning the trial.

Trump also faces a gag order in his federal election interference case in Washington, D.C., which limits public statements on prosecutors, court staffers and their family members — if those remarks were designed to interfere with lawyers’ or court staff’s work on the case.

Copyright 2024 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.